Enzymind Labs

frustratingly I still cant tell if you’re messing with my head or serious -if it is genuine head-messin, then...im still confused...but anyway, i never put much creed in the 'nothing is verifiable' argument and consider it to be of the 'i know you are but what am i' variety of retort.  i have little patience for epistemological interpretations of objective reality. i make some assumptions just to make it through the day: science is distinct from fiction based on intent to find truth rather than simulate it and that science is built and dependent on a contiguous train of logical self supporting information, whereas fiction -and art- has the, advantage and weakness, of being able start anew from any frame of reference. 

which side of the informational event horizon were on makes no difference since it is by definition unknowable.  Also I think 'informational black hole' is a misnomer because information does not have an equivalent constant 'prybar' parameter such as the speed of light which was used as the basis to predict black holes.  Maybe 'associative relevance density' might suit the phenomena better.