"This is precisely what theory predicts for the boundary conditions of an informational black hole."
This is good. A nice kernel for development. Immediately makes me curious as to what 'theory' in this case is ...since general relativity predicts physical black holes, what's the informational equavalent theory...and what are the parallels. maybe black hole theory can be used to derive or template informational singularity theory. And what's the 'structure' of an IBH. A purely ontological entity or does it have a geometric equivalent ...trefoils...you even made me google 'Dawn Mollzigtub'...
I suppose enzymind could be kind of a parody of iteself as a kind of epistolary form of fiction with the blogs and comments...I have to to be careful about crossing that line though. Hard to go back. ...I've been wanting to write a 'textbook' of nonlinear biology to describe emergent processes but it would essentially be fiction at this point ...it might be a good exercise...
ultrafractal is nice. ive played with it quite a bit for its fractal 'zoomability'. for a while i was really hooked on using apophysis which could export various file types to both ultrafractal and space made me really want to try and use those kinds of tools for 'pseudo' research into biological strange attractor design.
...Im still waging the war against the bioinvader inside me. Feel almost human again. May resume life tomorrow.
Comments
informational singularities
RE: 'Internet Black Hole Discovered'
It seems clear that this boundary condition (surface integral of linguistic content = 0) is correct. This is equivalent to stating that there are no words or sentences that have meaning outside of a particular linguistic system (semantics + syntax). As a concrete example, a complete dictionary defines all its words with those word, so by definition there are no valid words not in the dictionary (although there are certainly valid sentences not in a dictionary).
A technological singularity immediately suggests that such informational black holes exist. They are not physical objects, just a set of information cut off (inaccessible) to humans (or any physical object) outside. If such a singularity exists, it must be constantly accessing information next to it, and this new information (ordered bits, if you will) is then inaccessible. This is just how gravitational black holes operate on matter (mass).
There is no theory, for informational or gravitational black holes, that purports to describe their internal structure. There can't logically be such a theory, because this knowledge would constitute information extracted from the black hole -- that would violate what they are. There is a 'state' parameter that is accessible for gravitational holes; net rotation, or angular momentum. This can be inferred by frame dragging effects on the matter orbiting the black hole. I don't know if informational black holes have an analogous state property.
By coincidence 'Dawn Mollzigtub' is an anagram for 'Ludwig Boltzman', similar to the famous physicist 'Ludwig Boltzmann' (originator of statistical mechanics). The non-result of Googling her name suggests she, or records of her, may have been consumed by the black hole associated with Thetus.com. Don't fly too close to the sun.
Now that we've talked about the article, I suppose enzymind.com IS a pseudo-epistolary document. Perhaps it's/we're inside the informational black hole already. It would be hard to tell.
After I wrote the article, I considered that actually constructing the such a web page from scratch would be an interesting exercise. But it would be difficult and time consuming -- I don't think I could have done a better job than Thetus.com actually did, and the task would be equivalent to constructing a black hole. .
Post new comment